Dissident creators must think for themselves
In our artificial society, it's a necessary Turing Test
DISCLAIMER TO FUTURE EMPLOYERS IN CASE THE OVERTON WINDOW SHIFTS BACK AGAIN THAT ALSO HAPPENS TO BE TRUE:
I AM A SEXY ANTHROPOLOGIST. THIS IS A SATIRE FOR A PERSONAL STUDY I AM CONDUCTING IN THE NICHE OF DIGITAL VOLATILITY. NONE OF THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE REFLECT ANYTHING WHATSOEVER. THE ORIGINAL MATERIAL I AM PARODYING CAN BE FOUND HERE.
A week ago I posted a note which proved controversial:
I’m concerned about the younger generation of “based right-wingers” who are seeking out, marrying, and breeding with dumb women. This seems to mostly be a phenomena on X, but it’s not entirely exclusive to it. These are impressionable young men who are seeking out these dumb women to breed with in order to increase their status within a tiny little bubble. Their behavior is decreasing the collective IQ of our nation. These vulnerable young men think they are preserving their race when they are destroying it.
I chose my words spontaneously, and I stand by my statement. Nevertheless, some have ignored the words I actually wrote, and have taken the opportunity to denounce me as tattooed, Nietzschean, and childless. Now people have started a war on Substack, so I suppose I should respond.
Here are some things I did not say:
People should not have children;
People with children are low-IQ conservative hicks;
Smart women do not have the right to act dumb so they can secure a wealthy male provider;
Dumb women have it easy;
Living in a big city is easy;
None of these are true. (except for #4)
Instead, my criticism applies - as stated - to the following group: ‘impressionable young men who are seeking out these dumb women to breed with in order to increase their status within a tiny little bubble’.
By ‘young men’ I meant prominent influencers and the anon equivalents. (shitposters boosted by the X algorithm)
By ‘seeking out, marrying, and breeding with dumb women’ I meant participation in the game of seeking out as many dumb women as possible and pumping out children with them in order to preserve their race. Instead, these individuals work to ensure that they’re destroying their race by doing things like:
Marrying Asian women who enjoy being spanked at the dinner table;
Having masses of kids with low agency women (bean-counting) who need assistance going to the bathroom;
Traveling to brothels in third-world countries and bringing back servants;
Racialist porn studios that propose shifting the Overton Window in a sexual manner;
Giving up on American women and enjoying Indian ladies instead;
Founding natalist cults that mandate doing the naughty behind the church…
And so on, endlessly.
Here are some things that would not qualify as ‘seeking out, marrying, and breeding with dumb women’ and therefore would not be within the scope of my criticism:
Marrying women who didn’t go to liberal college;
Having kids with women who may be lower in IQ than you;
Watching dumb cartoons on a Tinder date to prepare for your next adventure;
Debating the merits of The Beatles as a band;
Rejecting American women for not being subservient and then proceeding to complain about the great replacement.
By ‘decreasing the collective IQ of our nation’ I referred to the fact that too many people who have risen to ‘leadership’ positions in our community are some variety of Asian-fetishist, Red Scare fan, or home-flipper in Nebraska. Too many ingrates; too many people who insist that they want to preserve their race when they actually want to destroy it. Unserious people who have spent a decade in the online spotlight and have nothing to show for it in the real world, at either a macro or micro scale, except the expansion of their Discord channels.
All of this takes me to my concluding point, which is that I consider the act of marrying and breeding with an intelligent American woman to be an achievement that I regard as necessary in anyone who I will view as a rockstar. Rockstars should have fans.
If a man can’t do the human basics (like marry and breed with an intelligent American woman) in the face of the background systemic dysfunction of our society then I don’t have faith that he can achieve legitimately ambitious projects - like becoming a rockstar - in the face of active repression.
Note that this standard is intended to be applied to rockstars: the D’Annunzio’s of our time. Rockstars should have fans. Different standards apply to grifters and hustlers: there will always be anons like Delicious Tacos who are fun personalities but genuinely unsuited for marrying American women. These people should be heard, but never followed. Delicious Tacos would agree.
I appreciate that everyone on Substack did their best to insult me cleverly despite being made furious by my Note. I will attempt to return the favor, but I must be direct: their Jesus-quoting demonstrated a lack of understanding the basic tenets of reason. A rockstar does not Jesus-quote; a rockstar does not make excuses. A rockstar does not put words in the mouths of fifth positionist bohemians in order to attack us on Substack. These insults fundamentally misrepresented my views and moved straight into fundamentalist Jesus-quoting, which was pretty clearly what they wanted to do all along.
I will follow this piece up with three in the near future:
How I understand dissident creators. I don’t think this industry is primarily political in nature, but relates to forming a parallel society without being bound by the rules of the previous one. I believe I can show this conclusively with new guidelines and will publish them soon.
How I intend to help my community with this issue to the extent I can.
Some places you can get cool tattoos while learning about Nietzsche.
Thank you for reading.
If you enjoyed this essay, please consider supporting this project by leaving a like or upgrading to paid. Upgrading will also gain you access to my book clubs, salons, and ability to view my locked posts. All revenue goes towards supporting my independent writing career, and is truly appreciated.
All hail the new art right!
-Rachel
The right won't admit it, but they get just as "triggered" by words as leftists did around 2018. No matter how articulate and detailed your arguments may be, the mere presence of certain words beside certain other words produces the same reaction in right-wingers as a bull seeing a red cape.
Rachel, with all due respect I think "marrying a high IQ American woman" is an overly high expectation that is not achievable in a scalable fashion. We're not gonna breed our way out of any problems we have now, so I think what we need is to not focus on people's reproductive lives or have this cringe virtue signaling about how certain sexual behavior is helping to save western civilization. Having high IQ white kids is a nice thing but generational timescales are not really relevant and people's individual behaviors are not gonna meaningfully impact overall dyslexic trends.